HomeCommunity Guidelines
Community guidelines

Argue hard. Leave the person standing.

Four rules, four things that are never allowed, and exactly what happens when one of them is broken. Written to be read in five minutes rather than to be quoted in a dispute.

The four rules

What is expected in every room

Each one exists because of a specific way a discussion dies. They are not general good manners; they are the conditions the method needs to work at all.

Argue with the position, never the person

The whole method rests on being able to attack an argument hard while leaving the person holding it intact. Disagreement is the point of a discussion room. Contempt ends it, because the moment someone expects to be mocked they stop offering the half-formed idea that was worth hearing.

Attack reasoning, evidence and conclusions as hard as you like
No insults, mockery, or comments about who someone is
Nothing about caste, religion, region, gender, disability or background
The line, concretely

"That conclusion ignores the second data set" is the exercise working. "Only an idiot would say that" is the same point with the exercise removed.

Submit your own work

Every submission is marked by a person against a rubric, and a certificate is only worth carrying because of that. Passing off someone else's work — a classmate's, a model's, a website's — as your own removes the only thing the credential was measuring.

Write your own submissions, in your own words
Cite what you used, including AI assistance, when you used it
Never share your account, and never sit an assessment for someone else
Where AI sits

Using a model to research, check or challenge your reasoning is fine and we would rather you did. Submitting its output as your reasoning is not, and it is usually obvious to a facilitator who has read your last four submissions.

Leave room for the quiet half

A discussion where three people speak for forty minutes has not happened. Facilitators will actively bring in people who have not spoken, and part of the standard here is that you make that easy rather than harder.

Make your point, then let it be tested
Do not talk over people or repeat a point to win by volume
Come having read the case — an unprepared room wastes everyone's hour
What good looks like

Someone changes their position mid-discussion and says why. That is the highest-scoring thing that can happen in a room, not a loss.

What is said in a cohort stays in the cohort

People reason out loud in these rooms, which means being wrong in front of others. That only works if the room is not being recorded, screenshotted and reposted somewhere else.

No recording or screenshotting a discussion to share outside it
Do not post anyone's personal details, ever — including your own
Do not bring a disagreement from a room onto a public feed
Why this one is strict

A single reposted clip is enough to make an entire cohort careful, and a careful room stops producing the half-formed ideas that discussions exist to test.

Never permitted

Four things with no warning step

Everything else starts with a conversation. These start with the account being suspended while it is investigated.

Harassment

Targeting someone repeatedly, in rooms or in messages, after being asked to stop. Includes following someone across the platform.

Hate & threats

Slurs, dehumanising language, or any threat of harm. There is no debate-context exemption for this and there will not be one.

Anything involving a minor

Sexual content involving anyone under 18, or an adult seeking private contact with a school-cohort student. Reported to authorities, not just removed.

Scams & spam

Selling, phishing, fake certificates, promising jobs for money, or bulk-messaging learners. Includes impersonating staff or a facilitator.

What happens when a rule is broken

Proportionate, written down, and appealable

You are always told which rule and which incident. A decision you cannot see the reason for is not one you can learn from.

01

A word from the facilitator

Most of what goes wrong in a room is someone getting heated, and most of it ends here — in the room, at the time, with no record kept.

02

A formal warning

For a repeat, or for something a facilitator escalates. It is written down, you are told exactly which rule and which incident, and it stays on file for a year.

03

Removal from a room or cohort

Losing discussion access for a period, or being taken out of a cohort with the term's submissions preserved. Your institution is told when you are in its cohort.

04

Account suspension

For sustained breaches or for anything in the never-permitted list. Certificates already verified stay verifiable; the account does not reopen.

05

Appeal

Every decision above can be appealed once, to someone who was not involved in making it. Appeals are answered within ten working days.

Questions

What people ask about the rules

Almost certainly not. Being argued with firmly — including having your reasoning taken apart in front of a room — is what you came for. A breach is when the comment stops being about the argument and starts being about you.
To research, to check your reasoning, to argue against you — yes, and say so. To write the submission you hand in — no. The marks exist to describe your reasoning, and a certificate that describes a model's reasoning is worth nothing to you at an interview.
Every discussion, message and profile has a report control, and reports go to the moderation team. If you are in a school or college cohort, they also route to a named adult at your institution. The Safety page sets out what happens after you press it.
Certificates already issued remain publicly verifiable — a third party who verified one should not have it disappear. Your submissions stay with your institution's cohort record. You can request an export of your own data at any point.
Yes, and more strictly, because they hold the room. A facilitator who breaches them loses certification. Report them the same way you would report anyone else; those reports go to a moderator, never to the facilitator involved.
No — the Terms of Service and the Privacy Policy are the binding documents, and they win where the wording differs. This page is the plain-language version of what is expected in practice, and it is written to be read rather than to be enforceable.
Reports are read by a person

Something happened in a room?
Tell us.

Every discussion, message and profile has a report control, and every report reaches a moderator. The Safety page explains what happens next.