HomeSkill Intelligence
Skill intelligence

Know exactly what you cannot do yet.

Where you stand against a role you want, which gap costs you most, and what closes it — computed from work that was actually marked, not from a questionnaire about yourself.

A readiness view

What it looks like

Sample figures for a Product Manager target. Yours starts at the diagnostic and moves from there.

71%ready for Product Manager · up from 58% eight weeks ago
Readiness by skill
Problem framing88%
Data interpretation74%
Stakeholder communication61%
Prioritisation under scarcity52%
Technical fluency79%
Biggest closable gap: prioritisation under scarcity. Three cases and one workshop target it directly — expected readiness gain +9.
Three views

Readiness, roadmap, progression

One answers where you are, one answers what to do, one answers whether it is working.

Role readiness

Pick a role and see where you stand against what that role actually demands, skill by skill, with your evidence behind each bar. Not a self-rating — a computed position against a rubric.

Readiness broken down per skill, not one blended figure
Each bar links to the work that produced it
Recomputed every time marked work lands
What it tells you

"You are ready on framing and technical fluency. Prioritisation is the gap, and it is the one this role interviews hardest on."

Career roadmap

The gaps, ordered by how much closing each would move your readiness — then mapped onto specific modules, cases and workshops that target them.

Ordered by impact, not by course catalogue convenience
Names the specific module, not a subject area
Re-orders itself as scores move
A typical next step

"Three cases on prioritisation under scarcity, then the Decision Memo workshop. Expected readiness gain: +9."

Skill progression

How each skill has moved over time, against your own history rather than against a cohort average — so a plateau is visible early enough to do something about.

Per-skill history, with the work annotated on it
Plateaus and regressions surfaced, not hidden
Compare against your stage, if you want the context
Why history matters

A score of 61 that was 44 two months ago is a very different situation from a 61 that was 68. The number alone cannot tell you which you are in.

How it is computed

From a marked rubric line to a recommendation

Five steps, none of which involve you rating yourself out of ten.

01

Marked work goes in

Submissions, discussions and case positions — each carrying component scores against a published rubric.

02

Components map to skills

A rubric line like "states a falsifier" feeds the skills that actually depend on it, across every case that tested it.

03

Skills map to roles

Each role carries a profile of what it demands and how much. Your readiness is your skills read against that profile.

04

Gaps become a route

The largest closable gaps are turned into an ordered list of specific modules, cases and workshops.

05

It updates itself

Every new piece of marked work re-runs the whole chain. Nothing here is a snapshot you have to refresh.

Questions

About skill intelligence

No. Nothing here is self-reported and nothing is inferred from a questionnaire. Every figure comes from work that was marked against a rubric somebody could argue with.
As many as you like, and it is worth tracking two — the role you want and the role you are closest to. The gap between those two readiness views is usually the most useful thing on the page.
Role profiles are added continuously and you can request one. In the meantime the closest published role plus your skill progression view covers most of the same ground.
Readiness for one role and your skill progression are free. Multiple roles, the full roadmap and the comparison views open up once you own a course.
Only what you publish. Skill Intelligence is private by default, and most people publish the skill scores while keeping the roadmap to themselves.
Baseline is free

You cannot close
a gap you cannot see.

Take the diagnostic, pick a target role, and get an honest first read on the distance.