Case of the Week
One case, opened to the whole platform. Post your position, read three others, and argue about the one you disagree with most.
Standing groups, topic boards and campus circles — asynchronous, ungraded, and open whenever you have twenty minutes rather than at a slot you booked a fortnight ago.
Both are in this menu and the names are almost identical, so here is the difference in three lines.
Group Discussions (live, graded): A fixed sixty-minute slot you booked when you started the module.
Groups & boards (async): All week, whenever you have twenty minutes.
Group Discussions (live, graded): Yes — a moderator scores you and it feeds your Profile Score.
Groups & boards (async): No. Nothing here is marked, which is exactly why people say the unfinished thought out loud.
Group Discussions (live, graded): Defending a position under challenge, on the record.
Groups & boards (async): Thinking out loud, asking the thing you did not want to ask in the room, and keeping momentum between sessions.
Looking for the moderated, scored sessions instead? Group Discussions is that page.
A sample. New groups are created by members every week.
One case, opened to the whole platform. Post your position, read three others, and argue about the one you disagree with most.
Interview debriefs, guesstimate practice and the running list of what companies actually asked this week.
Post work, get critique grounded in the problem, and give two critiques for every one you receive.
One paper or architecture write-up a fortnight, with somebody assigned to argue against it.
Questions answered by people currently doing the job, with answers kept and searchable rather than scrolling away.
Your college in one room — local study sessions, shared notes, and the campus leaderboard nobody admits to checking.
They differ in size and permanence, which turns out to be the thing that decides what people are willing to say.
Small, persistent, and tied to a track or a cohort. The same handful of people, week after week, which is what makes candour possible.
Open threads on a subject, searchable and kept. Good answers are pinned rather than scrolling into history.
Your campus in one place, including the people a year ahead of you who have already done the thing you are stuck on.
The third. Everybody's first post is worse than they wanted it to be, and it does not matter.
Filter by track, stage, institution or cadence. Most people end up in two groups and one board.
Open boards are immediate. Standing groups have a cap and a short request, because eight people is a group and eighty is a feed.
Nothing here is graded. The half-formed question is usually the most useful thing in the thread.
Critique groups enforce a ratio; the rest rely on the norm. Both work, and the ratio exists because norms alone did not.
Leave any group at any time. Your posts stay unless you delete them, and nothing announces your departure.
Nothing here is graded, which is exactly why it is where the useful half-formed thinking happens.
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalised content, and analyse our traffic. Non-essential cookies stay off until you choose. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies as described in our Cookie Policy.